Enbridge moved Wednesday to shift to federal court a Michigan lawsuit seeking shutdown of an oil pipeline that runs beneath a channel linking two of the Great Lakes.
The company argued that a 2019 lawsuit filed in a state court by Attorney General Dana Nessel should be heard by U.S. District Judge Janet Neff, who last month retained jurisdiction over a separate case initiated by Enbridge to keep oil flowing through its Line 5.
“We are hopeful that the attorney general will agree that it makes sense for her case and the Enbridge case to be decided by the federal court rather than risk duplicative litigation and inconsistent results,” spokesman Ryan Duffy said.
But Nessel said the “outrageous manoeuvre” violates a federal rule that moving cases from one court to another must be done within 30 days of the initial filing.
“We will address this flagrant attempt to undermine that process in court and remain fervently committed to our belief that the fate of Michigan’s greatest natural resources should be determined in a Michigan court,” Nessel said.
Enbridge’s gambit was the latest twist in a multi-year political and legal battle over Line 5, which carries about 87 million litres daily of crude oil and natural gas liquids between Superior, Wis., and Sarnia, Ont.
It passes through northern Wisconsin and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and is part of an Enbridge network transporting Canadian crude to refineries in both nations.
A 6.4-kilometre section is divided into two pipes that cross the bottom of the Straits of Mackinac, where Lake Michigan and Lake Huron meet. Environmental groups and Indigenous groups contend they risk a spill that could pollute hundreds of kilometres of water and shorelines, while Enbridge says they’ve never leaked and are in sound condition.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer ordered Enbridge in November 2020 to close the 68-year-old line, revoking a 1953 state easement allowing its placement in the straits. The company, based in Calgary, filed a federal lawsuit and ignored the Democratic governor’s May 12 shutdown deadline.
Nessel, who had sued in state court to enforce Whitmer’s order, urged Neff to return the case to state court. But the judge ruled last month that it was “properly in federal court” because it raises issues “under consideration at the highest levels of this country’s government.”
READ MORE: Planning for Canada-U.S. treaty talks on Line 5 ‘well underway,’ Ottawa says
They include Canada’s invocation of a 1977 treaty with the U.S. involving oil shipments between the two nations and federal pipeline safety regulation, Neff said.
Whitmer and Nessel responded this month by dropping their 2020 lawsuit and refocusing attention on the 2019 case filed in Michigan’s Ingham County. It argues that Line 5’s presence in the straits violates the public trust and state environmental law.
READ MORE: Line 5: Michigan drops oil pipeline lawsuit, refocuses on separate case
The judge, James Jamo, has scheduled a status hearing for Jan. 7.
Enbridge said in a statement that the two cases are similar and belong in the same court. The company said federal law allows a lawsuit defendant to move a case from state to federal court within 30 days of receiving “solid and unambiguous information” that such an action could be taken.
Neff’s ruling Nov. 16 “provided the solid information relied on here, and the case has now been removed for further proceedings before the federal district court,” the company said.
Nessel disputed Enbridge’s interpretation of the rules.
“Our residents deserve more than a company who seeks to profit from our natural resources while at the same time attempting to evade legal review of their actions by our state’s courts,” she said.
© 2021 The Associated Press